This post may get a lot of people in a tizzy. The reason for this is that if you care anything about natural and alternative treatments, you generally fall into one of two camps: those who love it and those who hate it. I am one of the few who falls somewhere in the middle. I am not gung-ho western medicine (much to the confusion of my physician husband; as an anesthesiologist in training he was quite puzzled when I wanted a natural childbirth), and I embrace a few alternative treatments. I am willing to do the research when I hear about something new and give it a try.
I have been thinking quite a bit about natural and alternative medical treatments for the past couple of days. Why? Because I think Gwen is teething (notice I say "think;" I thought she was teething several times since she was 4 months old, however, if the fever, rosy cheeks, need to constantly cuddle, excessive napping, general fussiness, and incessant chewing are any indication, she is teething this time). She looks like she feels awful, and I, of course, want to do whatever I can do to relieve her pain.
I have gotten quite a bit of advice each time I thought Gwen was teething: tylenol, motrin, gum massage, cold teething rings, sophie the giraffe, orajel, hylands teething tabs, baltic amber necklace, chew beads, teething bling...the list goes on and on.
I have a very unique background when it comes to evaluating this advice. I have a degree in biology. I am married to a doctor and had a short stint in medical school myself. I have a couple of years of graduate training in immunology, so I understand what is taking place within her immune system. I also have 3 years of graduate training in medical dietetics with an emphasis in supplements (I took a supplements course and I am currently stalled in writing my thesis on supplement use because of a certain teething little girl).
I tend to see any medical treatment as falling into 3 categories: 1.) it could hurt you, 2.) it might not help you but won't hurt you, and 3.) it should help you and shouldn't hurt you. None of these are absolutes. For example, sometimes drugs are released to the market (I am talking about FDA approved western medicines), and we find out once a large portion of the population takes them that they are harmful to certain subsets. The background studies didn't have sufficient numbers to discover that the drugs were harmful. However, when a traditional pharmaceutical is found to be harmful to certain individuals, it either is pulled from the market or is required to provide a warning against its use in certain circumstances. We have another safeguard with pharmaceuticals: they require a prescription from a physician who has received many years of training and who, likely, is keeping up with the current medication warnings.
Now for natural treatments: I hear so many people talk about how natural medicine is safe and wonderful. It kind of gives you an ooey gooey feeling to hear about it. However, natural substances can be some of the most dangerous. For one thing, you can obtain them yourself, in any quantity you wish, without any formal training on how to use them (or even if you should use them). Secondly, natural does not mean safe. Example? How about arsenic? It is all natural. But it is also toxic. I don't hear people running around talking about it as a natural medicine because I think we would all agree that would be foolhardy. But many natural treatments can be just as harmful, and even deadly. And before you say, "I wouldn't take arsenic. I just take some herbals and vitamins," I want to let you know that those substances are not innocuous either. For example, in the world of vitamins, there is something called the UL, or the tolerable upper limit. This is the amount that it is estimated that you can take at which 97% of the population will not feel ill effect. However, 3% may still have problems at this dose, and if you exceed that amount the percentage of people who will suffer problems also climbs. If you overdose on Vitamin C, you might just get some tummy cramps and diarrhea. If you overdose on Vitamin A and have a history of smoking, it might increase your risk of lung cancer and death. If you overdose on water soluble vitamins, you will likely just pee them out (for the most part), but if you overdose on fat soluble vitamins you store them in your fat and might take so much that you die. And people take multivitamins and single vitamin formulations thinking that they are doing their body good.
Let's talk about western medicine now. One of the great things about western medicine is that we manufacture them. This flies in the face of the natural movement. Why would you want to put something manmade into your body? There are some very good reasons. Men can make molecules that are specific and pure. If you have a problem in your body, you need a specific molecule to target that problem. Purity is a friend to the ill as well. When you have a pure substance you know exactly how much you are taking and you know that that is all you are taking. The pure molecule is able to target the problem without introducing several other substances into your body. A very real problem with natural substances is that you can only obtain pure ingredients via manmade methods. If you go out and use a root or a leaf from a plant you might get a plethora of active ingredients. These molecules may work together for good, or they may cause side effects (and before you get on me for being biased, yes western medicines have side effects as well: one molecule may act on several pathways, or may cause a signaling cascade that results in untoward symptoms).
There are several natural and alternative therapies for which I think there is quite a bit of evidence and for which I fully support the use. For example, melatonin does appear to be helpful for people who are having trouble regulating sleep. You need to be careful of how much you take (too much of a good thing can be a bad thing), and if you have any medical conditions you should check with your doctor before use, but it can be a useful tool. It can be especially useful in children with autism and adults with Huntington's Disease, who often have trouble sleeping. Cinnamon has been shown in studies to be effective in blood sugar regulation. A therapy for which there is extensive evidence and for which I have a great deal of respect is accupuncture. In fact, I am going to try it soon in an attempt to rid myself of migraine headaches, for which I currently take a combination of acetaminophen, caffeine, and a barbiturate (note: while I have great respect for accupuncture, I cannot say the same of traditional chinese medicine herbal supplements: they have been demonstrated to often be contaminated with harmful heavy metals that are toxic to the body). But if you decide to use alternative treatments, first seek medical advice. It will do you no good if you take something at the wrong dose or in the wrong way, thus negating its usefulness or making it harmful.
Then there is the category of probably won't help but it won't hurt. And this is the reason that I am writing this post. When I was looking into teething treatments, I stumbled upon many things that made me question what I believed regarding therapy in my baby. I am much pickier about what I will give to her compared with what I will try. For example, I took fenugreek to increase breastmilk production. I realize that there is little data to support its effectiveness (aside from anecdotes from mother's who say they successfully increased milk production, but anecdotal data is the weakest form of data), but I also know that a problem within the supplements industry is that there is very little incentive to perform studies to gain evidence. The reason pharmaceutical studies occur is because there is big incentive in the form of a big pay out in the end if the drug goes to market. Supplements are already on the market and each formulation is sold by several companies, so if one company puts in the time and money for a study, they will likely never make back enough money to make up for it. So I took Fenugreek. I think it was effective, but I am an n of 1 and you need 3 in the experimental group and 3 in the control group if you ever hope to reach statistical significance.
Another reason I was hesitant to try supplements in Gwen is that pharmaceuticals have to be demonstrated to be safe in order to be approved by the FDA. Supplements have to be demonstrated to be unsafe in order to be pulled from the market. They are not FDA approved and it is very difficult to get them pulled from the market because it is very difficult in a complex world to show that it was the supplement that harmed someone, and that is even if people report an adverse event to the right government agency.
As for dosing Gwen with something, I am all for giving her tylenol and motrin. I know that at the doses at which I am giving her these medications her liver (tylenol) and kidneys (motrin) are able to metabolize the drugs (tangent: speaking of the liver and the kidneys, your body can detox itself. It doesn't need help from a juice fast or any other detox beverage or pill. God made your body so it could detox itself. If he hadn't done that, we would have all died long ago. So save your money and skip the detox drinks. You are just making yourself some expensive urine. Tangent over). Plus, the tylenol and motrin work. I can see a marked difference in her pre- and post-medicine. I tried orajel on her, and it doesn't work very well (I tested it on myself and it didn't work well and wore off in less than 10 minutes, so I decided it is not worth introducing this pain med into her tiny little system). As for Hyland's teething tablets, I really wanted to use them - I had several friends swear by them. But I didn't feel right about it. Our pediatrician also advised against them. They are not FDA approved, they may contain varying amounts of the active ingredients (in fact, Hyland's has been pulled from the shelves before for this very reason). Also, some of the active ingredients (belladonna, for example) can be toxic. So I decided not to give it to my little baby. The one saving grace of this drug is that it is a homeopathic treatment, and one of the central tenets of homeopathy is that the more dilute the active ingredients are the more effective they will be (does this make sense to anyone else???? The other major tenet of homeopathy is like cures like. The example given from the Hyland's website is that if you had watery eyes you might use onion to treat it because onions make your eyes water when you cut them. Once again, does this make sense to anyone else????). While this doesn't make sense to me, it at least means that belladonna is likely in such low quantities that it will not harm little ones. So if you decided to give it to your baby, I am not judging you and I am sure your baby will be fine. I just decided not to give it to my baby.
The things that I decided to try, aside from pharmaceuticals, is jewelry. Two jewelry items that I have are to make me fashionable and to provide Gwen a chewing surface. These are my teething bling necklace and my chew beads bracelet. They are both baby safe, dishwasher safe, bpa free silicone. She loves them. And I really like them too. (I know these aren't alternative treatments, I just really like my teething jewelry and wanted to talk about it). With teething jewelry, I always have something with me that she can chew on, if need be. Plus, she would much rather chew on something she shouldn't chew on (like my jewelry), than something she should chew on (like a cool teething ring), so I figure I can trick her with teething jewelry. The third piece of jewelry that I bought is a baltic amber necklace for Gwen. Supposedly, amber oil gets in through the skin from wearing the necklace and is anti-inflammatory. While there isn't evidence to support this, I figured it wouldn't hurt her (there is a breakaway clasp if she gets it caught on something to prevent strangulation, and a knot between each bead so if the string breaks she won't choke on the stones), plus she gets to wear a necklace, which is pretty awesome and kind of makes her look like a flower child. Best case scenario? It works by some unknown mechanism and makes my baby feel better. Worst case scenario? I wasted $22 on something that doesn't work, but have still provided Gwen with a pretty snazzy necklace. Like I said, this falls under the category of might not help, but won't hurt.
Moral of the story: Get educated. Avoid things that harm, embrace things that work, and don't sweat the things that might not work but won't hurt you.